Google reveals some robot car crash details

June 8, 2015
After repeated calls for disclosure from Consumer Watchdog, Google today said it would issue regular reports offering some details of crashes involving its driverless cars. The public interest group said more details are still needed.

After repeated calls for disclosure from Consumer Watchdog, Google today said it would issue regular reports offering some details of crashes involving its driverless cars. The public interest group said more details are still needed.

Google released its first of what it said would be monthly reports on a website dedicated to the driverless car project. Included in the report is a synopsis written by Google of the twelve accidents since it began testing the robot cars in 2009.

“We now know a few more details of what happened,” says John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project director. “The problem is that it’s Google’s version and they want us to take their word for it.” 
Consumer Watchdog said the Internet giant must release official accident reports that include not only the Internet giant’s version of what happened, but what the other drivers and any witnesses say.

Consumer Watchdog has repeatedly called on Google to release the official reports, most recently when Simpson confronted Google executives on the issue at the annual shareholders meeting on Wednesday.

Crash reports are essential to understanding how the robot cars interact with human drivers, which likely will be the biggest challenge the vehicles will face, Consumer Watchdog said.  In most of the crashes the Google robot cars were rear-ended.  That could mean that the vehicles tend to stop more quickly than human drivers expect.

Another interesting fact learned from the report was that in two of the crashes the human driver assumed control as it was happening. More details are necessary to understand what happens when human drivers take control.

“Google is dribbling out bits information in the hope to silence legitimate calls for full transparency,” says Simpson. “They are testing on public roads and the public has a right to know exactly what happened when something goes wrong.”

Sponsored Recommendations

Remote Expert: Access OEM Services On Your Autel Tablet

Carrying active OEM subscriptions for all manufacturers is not possible for many shops. However, access to this software is required for certain modern vehicles and repairs, and...

How to Properly Lubricate your Air Tools

Learn how to properly lubricate your AIRCAT air tools to keep them running at peak performance. Discover essential daily maintenance and storage techniques, along with the right...

Save Time with Standard's Kits & Multipacks

Stock up on essential repair kits! Discover how Standard's multipacks simplify repairs and reduce downtime.

Fuel Injection Training – Pro Tips for Techs

Choosing the right fuel injector matters. Learn best practices for selection and related component recommendations.

Voice Your Opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Vehicle Service Pros, create an account today!