Scott Jett was in Ooltewah, Tenn., was faced with a 2015 GMC Yukon with a misfire under all operating conditions. The engine seemed to crank over well, and Jett experimented with easy-to-perform tests to guide him toward more pinpointed tests.
Get caught up on this vehicle test case details.
What would you recommend doing next, given the data bullet points in last month’s challenge?
- Replace the piston/rings/recondition block
- Replace the intake valve spring
- Machine the cylinder head gasket surface
- Replace the exhaust valve spring
For those of you who chose answer No. 4, congratulations!
Answer No. 1 is incorrect. Although the data shows that the fault is only present during the duration of the intake valve opening, this fault could not be in the low-end of the engine as the fault would be present and showing symptoms whether or not the engine was cranking.
Answer No. 2 is incorrect. Replacing the intake valve spring wouldn’t make sense as a fault with the intake valve or spring would not exhibit during intake valve opening duration. Answer No. 3 is also incorrect. A cylinder head gasket sealing surface fault isn’t likely to present only during intake valve duration. Furthermore, measurement would show if the cylinder head required machine work to true-up a sealing surface.
The only logical answer is No. 4. After careful inspection, the exhaust valve spring was found to be broken. During cranking conditions there was enough spring tension to return the valve to the rested/sealed position. Under running conditions, the engine is rotating four times as fast and the spring cannot keep the exhaust valve closed. The spring was replaced and driveability was restored.
Be sure to read the next Motor Age issue for the answer to this month’s challenge and what was discovered!