Welcome back to another edition of “The data doesn’t lie,” a regular feature in which I pose a puzzling case study.
So frequently I’m called upon to view a lab scope capture or a scan tool data capture to offer an opinion for what I think may be wrong with the vehicle. Many times, it’s something simple and easy to see when you know what you’re looking at. But occasionally, I’m faced with data that offers a significant challenge. What I mean is, sometimes I really must stare hard at multiple pieces of data to draw a conclusion/diagnosis that I’m comfortable standing behind.
Buried in the data
Such is the case from my good buddy Tony Mossuto, in Jacksonville, Fla. Tony reached out to me about a 2020 Ram 1500 pickup with a Hemi 5.7L that was giving him trouble — a pesky P0303 (Cylinder No. 3 misfire). Suspecting an engine mechanical fault these engines are notorious for, Tony reached out on several Facebook groups and posted some lab scope captures. He hoped for some usable input but couldn’t seem to locate any that corroborated his suspicions. Tony shared this info with me and I will be the first to admit that I had to do a bit of soul-searching to pinpoint a suspect fault.
Starting with the basics, Tony wisely captured a relative compression test (Figure 1). With the blue trace representing ignition event for cylinder No. 3, and the red trace representing starter current for all eight cylinders, it’s easy to see that no significant compression loss is occurring for any of the cylinders, not even for suspect cylinder No. 3.
I then viewed a captured including absolute pressure values from the intake manifold while cranking the engine over repeatedly. According to the piston chart, when suspect cylinder No. 3 is under compression the vacuum in the intake manifold intensifies (Figure 2). This proves a compression loss (although not significant) is present and the loss is not to the intake manifold. Now we are getting somewhere!
I then instructed Tony to send me a capture reflecting pressure changes in the exhaust stream while cranking, this can be seen in blue (Figure 3). As No. 3 piston descends on the expansion-stroke the effect on the exhaust stream can be seen. The failure of the correlating event can be seen as a peak of lower amplitude (compared to the others). A similar event can be seen at the point where the No. 3 intake valve opens. This helps point me in the right direction but also begs a few questions.
The data doesn’t lie
With all the information in front of us, and the desired information not yet obtained, we are faced with deciding how to proceed. Here are some bullet points of what we know to be factual, and I will ask all of you, diligent readers, for your input on what they mean to you, collectively:
- No. 3 misfire, spark plugs and coils were swapped with no change
- Relative compression test shows no significant loss in any cylinder
- Intake vacuum intensifies under suspect cylinder No. 3 compression
- Corroborating evidence seen in tailpipe pressure trace
Given this information, what would you do next?
- Replace the camshaft due to worn lobes.
- Have machine shop inspect intake valve seat.
- Replace head gasket due to compression in cooling system.
- Have machine shop inspect exhaust valve seat.